%0 Journal Article 
%T Obligaciones morales con seres no humanos
%J CS;No. 13
%D 2014
%@ 20110324
%U http://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/revista_cs/article/view/1825
%X There exist five models of ethical reflection from which it is possible to take into account the 
debate surrounding the topic of the relationships between human beings and non-humans: 
the deontological, the contractualist, the utilitarian, the neo-Aristotilian and the discursive 
models. This article will examine, based upon these five models, the question of the moral 
status assigned to animals and to nature, along with the possibility of each to support the 
extension of moral obligations. Toward this end, it will examine the central arguments for 
recognizing or negating moral considerations to non-human life forms as well as the scope of 
these arguments in order to understand the configuration and the limits of the ethical community. This will then allow for the classification of the aforementioned ethical approaches 
taking into account their links to various forms of anthropocentrism or biocentrism.
%K Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales
%K Producción intelectual registrada - Universidad Icesi
%K Ethical Theories
%K Moral Community
%K Moral
%K Naturaleza
%~ GOEDOC, SUB GOETTINGEN