Precedente - Revista Jurídica Vol. 15

URI permanente para esta colecciónhttp://hdl.handle.net/10906/84873

Examinar

Mostrando 1 - 7 de 7

La Corte Constitucional y el Consejo de Estado frente al control de convencionalidad en el contexto de terminación del conflicto armado en Colombia
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) Castillo Galvis, Sergio Hernando
This article of reflection is the product of a research process, whose purpose is to study the position of the Constitutional Court and the Council of State against the exercise of conventionality control in the context of the termination of the armed conflict in Colombia. The following two major categories are proposed: i) The generalities of conventionality control as an international state obligation; ii) The specific position of the High Courts in relation to the conception and exercise of control. The results obtained are due to the application of a qualitative methodological framework with a content analysis technique, concluding that there is a divergent character between the conception of the Inter-American mechanism that the Constitutional Court has and the one that the Council of State has, at a general level, which will undoubtedly have an impact on the post-conflict scenario that is currently occurring in Colombia.
El síndrome normativo: estudio de la eficacia de la normativa sobre caminos en el siglo xix antioqueño
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) Botero Bernal, Andrés
The theme of the paths is a constant in several historical moments of the antioqueño normative system of the 19th century, but, given the impossibility of presenting a study of all the elements where it is found, they chose three cases to observe there how the law became obsessed in the construction and maintenance of roads. These three cases are: i) the first republic (1811-1815), ii) the regulations of the provincial Chamber between 1848 and 1851, and iii) state legislation between 1856 and 1886. This phenomenon may well be elucidated if a allegory of primarily psychoanalytic origin: the obsessivecompulsive neurosis, which refers to the normative syndrome. Based on this clinical structure, the three cases could be thought of in a different way from what has generally been done, thus clearly envisaging situations where the normative syndrome and symbolic efficacy dominate the political-normative environment.
Sobre la universal contingencia de los derechos humanos
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) Monteros Sánchez, Javier Espinoza de los
Our theme is the universality of human rights. Here we will try to elucidate what its universal nature consists of. We consider that such a character is in terms of form, but not in terms of content. We intend to give an account of the role of the representation of rights as universal: that is nothing to make invisible the contingency of this right and legitimize the decision (whether legislative and above all judicial) adopted by virtue of which it is based on a premise of an objective nature. For this, in order to access this description, we will use the elements of the theory of the society of Niklas Luhmann and Raffaele De Giorgi. By means of such an observation perspective it will become clear that, lacking universal content, the rights do not constitute -as indicated by the constitutional thought of the most recent invoice- an «objective limit» in relation to legislative normative production; that in determining the compatibility or noncompatibility of the normative production of the legislator in relation to fundamental
Entre las fisuras y el complejo encaje del “asilo diplomático” en el contexto europeo: anverso y reverso
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) La Spina, Encarnación
Diplomatic asylum is a form of international protection whose legal nature has been widely debated. On the one hand, because it is a customary practice with a heterogeneous conventional recognition in the inter-American system and, on the other hand, it has a difficult fit in the common European asylum system. Despite its historical reminiscences, in both geographical latitudes, diplomatic asylum could become a window of opportunity in the face of European fissures of international protection mechanisms in cases of humanitarian emergency. Based on this premise, this article attempts to analyse the peculiarities and differences between diplomatic asylum and other falsely related figures, and thus critically explore the opportunities and limits that it would represent in the common European asylum system itself.
Sobre a dimensão extraterritorial das obrigações estaduais em matéria de proteção internacional – Reflexões motivadas pelo Parecer Consultivo do Tribunal Interamericano de Direitos Humanos, de 30 de maio de 2018
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) Pinto Oliveira, A. Sofia
Neste breve comentário ao Parecer Consultivo OC-25/18, emitido a pedido da República del Ecuador, defendemos que, face à amplitude que o Tribunal Interamericano reconhece aos efeitos extraterritoriais que decorrem para o Estado do seu compromisso com o princípio do non-refoulement, o instituto do asilo diplomático é, de alguma forma, ultrapassado pela doutrina da eficácia extraterritorial dos direitos humanos.
El difícil encuadre del asilo diplomático como derecho humano. A propósito de la opinión consultiva número 25 de la Corte Interamericana
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) Arlettaz, Fernando
In its advisory opinion number 25, adopted at the request of Ecuador, the Inter- American Court returns to the issue of asylum, which it had already addressed in previous pronouncements. The Court insists on the problematic idea that the American Convention and the American Declaration consecrate an individual right to receive asylum. Moreover, according to the Court, although that right does not include diplomatic asylum, States must refrain from handing over asylum applicants when there is a risk to their life or liberty. However, it is not clear what the obligations of the territorial State are when another State refuses to hand over or grants diplomatic asylum to an individual.
Reconocimiento normativo y diferencias entre el asilo diplomático, asilo territorial y refugio en la opinión consultiva OC-25/18 de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
(Universidad Icesi, 2019-07-01) Molina Conzué, Diego Andrés
This comment focuses its study on Advisory Opinion OC-25/18 of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. In it, the Court distinguishes between three types of figures included in the institution of asylum: diplomatic asylum, territorial asylum and refuge. Said figures, in the opinion of the Court, present particular characteristics, not all of which are covered by the Convention, in regard to the right to seek and receive refuge, which does not occur with respect to the principle of non-refoulement.

Examinar

Envíos recientes